Dierenbescherming
Dierenbescherming mobile Google Core Web Vitals assessment:
- homepage is currently passing CWV. Jump to details.
- overall summary is currently passing CWV. Jump to details.
Homepage pagespeed
Mobile pageview experiences of real visitors for Dierenbescherming regarding the homepage (https://www.dierenbescherming.nl/) are as following per metric:
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile FCP is 1272ms.
86.5% had a good FCP experience
10.2% had a moderate FCP experience
3.3% had a poor FCP experience
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile LCP is 1633ms.
89.8% had a good LCP experience
8.3% had a moderate LCP experience
1.9% had a poor LCP experience
First Input Delay (FID)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile FID is 16ms.
98% had a good FID experience
1.8% had a moderate FID experience
0.3% had a poor FID experience
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile CLS is 0%.
91.5% had a good CLS experience
8.1% had a moderate CLS experience
0.4% had a poor CLS experience
Overall summary pagespeed
Mobile pageview experiences of real visitors for Dierenbescherming regarding the overall summary (www.dierenbescherming.nl) are as following per metric:
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile FCP is 1180ms.
91.8% had a good FCP experience
6% had a moderate FCP experience
2.2% had a poor FCP experience
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile LCP is 1258ms.
95.3% had a good LCP experience
3.6% had a moderate LCP experience
1.1% had a poor LCP experience
First Input Delay (FID)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile FID is 13ms.
98.2% had a good FID experience
1.5% had a moderate FID experience
0.3% had a poor FID experience
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile CLS is 0%.
88.9% had a good CLS experience
9.8% had a moderate CLS experience
1.3% had a poor CLS experience