Los Angeles FC
www.lafc.com
Website
Los Angeles FC mobile Google Core Web Vitals assessment:
- homepage is currently not passing CWV. Jump to details.
- overall summary is currently not passing CWV. Jump to details.
Homepage pagespeed
Mobile pageview experiences of real visitors for Los Angeles FC regarding the homepage (https://www.lafc.com/) are as following per metric:
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile FCP is 2777ms.
59.5% had a good FCP experience
18.1% had a moderate FCP experience
22.4% had a poor FCP experience
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile LCP is 4566ms.
47.1% had a good LCP experience
22.1% had a moderate LCP experience
30.8% had a poor LCP experience
First Input Delay (FID)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile FID is 42ms.
87.1% had a good FID experience
7.2% had a moderate FID experience
5.7% had a poor FID experience
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile CLS is 19%.
38.1% had a good CLS experience
41.9% had a moderate CLS experience
20% had a poor CLS experience
Overall summary pagespeed
Mobile pageview experiences of real visitors for Los Angeles FC regarding the overall summary (www.lafc.com) are as following per metric:
First Contentful Paint (FCP)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile FCP is 2791ms.
54.8% had a good FCP experience
24% had a moderate FCP experience
21.2% had a poor FCP experience
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile LCP is 3521ms.
58.2% had a good LCP experience
22.4% had a moderate LCP experience
19.5% had a poor LCP experience
First Input Delay (FID)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile FID is 19ms.
93.8% had a good FID experience
4.4% had a moderate FID experience
1.8% had a poor FID experience
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
Over 28-days period, the 75th percentile CLS is 17%.
63.3% had a good CLS experience
17.8% had a moderate CLS experience
18.9% had a poor CLS experience